[Answered] NURS 6050 Week 8 Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation – Homework Solution

[Answered] NURS 6050 Week 8 Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation – Homework Solution

ADVOCATING FOR THE NURSING ROLE IN PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION

As their names imply, the honeyguide bird and the honey badger both share an affinity for honey. Honeyguide birds specialize in finding beehives but struggle to access the honey within. Honey badgers are well-equipped to raid beehives but cannot always find them. However, these two honey-loving species have learned to collaborate on an effective means to meet their objectives. The honeyguide bird guides honey badgers to newly discovered hives. Once the honey badger has ransacked the hive, the honey guide bird safely enters to enjoy the leftover honey.

NURS 6050 Week 8 Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation
NURS 6050 Week 8 Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation

Much like honeyguide birds and honey badgers, nurses and health professionals from other specialty areas can—and should—collaborate to design effective programs. Nurses bring specialties to the table that make them natural partners to professionals with different specialties. When nurses take the requisite leadership in becoming involved throughout the healthcare system, these partnerships can better design and deliver highly effective programs that meet objectives.

In this Assignment, you will practice this type of leadership by advocating for a healthcare program. Equally as important, you will advocate for a collaborative role of the nurse in the design and implementation of this program. To do this, assume you are preparing to be interviewed by a professional organization/publication regarding your thoughts on the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on your thinking regarding the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.
  • Select a healthcare program within your practice and consider the design and implementation of this program.
  • Reflect on advocacy efforts and the role of the nurse in relation to healthcare program design and implementation.

The Assignment: (2–4 pages)

In a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions:

  • Tell us about a healthcare program, within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?
  • Who is your target population?
  • What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?
  • What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?
  • What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?
  • Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why?

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 8

Submit your interview transcript.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK8Assgn+LastName+Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation
Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation

NURS 6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Program Design In a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions.·   Tell us about a healthcare program within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?·   Who is your target population?·   What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?·   What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?
45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

Response provides a clear and complete summary of the healthcare program, including an accurate and detailed description of the costs and projected outcomes of the program. …Response provides a clear and accurate description that fully describes the target population. …Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including specific examples. …Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. …Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions as well as fully explaining impacts to program design.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

Response provides a summary of the healthcare program, including a description of the costs and project outcomes of the program. …Response provides an accurate description of the target population. …Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including some examples. …Response provides an accurate description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. …Response provides an accurate explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and somewhat explains impacts to program design.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague or incomplete or does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program. …Description of the target population is vague or inaccurate. …Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program is vague, inaccurate, or does not include specific examples. …Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague or inaccurate. …Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague or inaccurate.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague and inaccurate, does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program, or is missing. …Description of the target population is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, and specific examples is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. …Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Program Implementation·  What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implantation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?·  Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why you think this?
40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent

Response provides a clear, accurate, and complete explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. …Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs, including specific examples. …Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected.

35 to >31.0 pts

Good

Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. …Response provides an accurate explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs and may include some specific examples. …Response provides and accurate description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected.

31 to >27.0 pts

Fair

Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete. …Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague or inaccurate and/or does not include specific examples. …Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is inaccurate or incomplete.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing.

40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused– neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is incomplete or missing.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, font, spacing, margins, indentations, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list (if sources are cited).
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥5) APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

  • Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide(6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    • Chapter 5, “Public Policy Design” (pp. 87–95 only)
    • Chapter 8, “The Impact of EHRs, Big Data, and Evidence-Informed Practice” (pp. 137–146)
    • Chapter 9, “Interprofessional Practice” (pp. 152–160 only)
    • Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 183–191 only)
  • American Nurses Association (ANA). (n.d.). AdvocacyLinks to an external site.. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (n.d.). Step by step: Evaluating violence and injury prevention policies: Brief 4: Evaluating policy implementationLinks to an external site.. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/injury/pdfs/policy/Brief%204-a.pdf
  • govLinks to an external site.. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/
  • Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementationLinks to an external site.. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.
  • Sacristán, J., & Dilla, T. D. (2015). No big data without small data: Learning health care systems begin and end with the individual patientLinks to an external site.. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(6), 1014–1017.
  • Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretionLinks to an external site.. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547.
NURS 6050 Week 8 Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation
NURS 6050 Week 8 Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation

Get 30% off your first purchase

X
Click to Order